arXiv (All)
open access
Benchmarking and Training Reward Models for Cross-Source Evidence Grounding in Search Agents
Existing approaches to training and evaluating search agents focus heavily on final-answer quality, largely neglecting how generated answers map back to retrieved evidence. Recent methods track citations to enforce grounding, but citation support alone does not establish source independence or wheth
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Not Worth Another Token: Marginal Value Estimation for Efficient Deep Research Agents#821977
- CiteGuard-RAG: A Validation-Centered AI System for Evidence-Grounded Question Answering#1109870
- IterSynth: Rethinking Deep Search Agents via Role-Decoupled Iterative Synthesis#1077373
- From Rubrics to Reliable Scores: Evidence-Grounded Text Evaluation with LLM Judges#987553
- Citation-Grounded Historical Phrase Profiles for Reviewer Agreement Forecasting#695631
Record · ID 1343033
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive