arXiv (All)
open access
Quantifying research uniqueness with Unbalanced Optimal Transport: Case studies of ten leading universities in neuroscience
Research evaluation has developed around quantity, citation impact and, more recently, the accumulation of research excellence, but these dimensions remain largely dependent on citations, which describe how research is received rather than what it contains. We propose uniqueness as a complementary d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Response to: "A Commentary on "Stabilizing Constructs through Collaboration across Different Research Fields as a Way to Foster the Integrative Approach of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project"#771555
- New Frontiers 2016-17 Brochure#957429
- The UNBELIEVABLE similar ideas between Theise and Menas’ ideas (2016) and my ideas (2002-2008) in Physics and Cognitive Neuroscience and Philosophy (the mind-brain problem, quantum mechanics, etc.)#774474
- Investigating biology#1317112
- From Virtual Molecules to Clinical Trials: How AI Is Reshaping Preclinical Drug Discovery.#244368
Record · ID 1343195
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive