arXiv (All)
open access
How to Train Your Intercept: A Comparison of Intercept Update Strategies in Coordinate Descent
Coordinate descent solvers for regularized generalized linear models (GLMs) differ in how they update the intercept. This seemingly routine choice can substantially affect convergence when the response is imbalanced. For direct coordinate descent on the original GLM loss, we compare a conservative s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Efficient Solvers for SLOPE in R, Python, Julia, and C++#1156227
- Ideal Paths for Approximating Logistic Gradient Descent Trajectories at Large Initialization#1199416
- Assessment of Lasso and Ridge models for soil swelling potential prediction.#771
- Gradient Prediction with Control Variates in the Cheap-Forward Regime#924025
- Gradient Prediction with Control Variates in the Cheap-Forward Regime#919796
Record · ID 1343238
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive