arXiv (All)
open access
Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Formal Verification
Vision-language models (VLMs) show promise in drafting radiology reports, yet they frequently suffer from logical inconsistencies, generating diagnostic impressions unsupported by their own perceptual findings or missing logically entailed conclusions. Standard lexical metrics heavily penalize clini
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Reliability Stress Tests and Decision-Time Routing for Chest X-ray Vision-Language Models#1186584
- Uncertainty Is Not a Safety Net for Clinical VQA, but Can It Anticipate Model Failure?#926081
- PathLang: A Language-Centered Benchmark for Vision-Language Models in Computational Pathology#1248609
- BiomedXPro: Prompt Optimization for Explainable Diagnosis with Biomedical Vision Language Models#1247301
- Learning to Adapt and Calibrate: Score Distribution Alignment for Few-Shot Uncertainty Prediction in Medical VLMs#997223
Record · ID 1343513
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive