arXiv (All)
open access
Rethinking Artifact Evaluation for Software Engineering in the Age of Generative AI
Peer review in software engineering research operates under tight time constraints, while generative AI has substantially reduced the human effort required to produce polished research narratives. Reviewer attention is often spent on aspects of submissions such as writing quality or literature posit
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Observing the Conduct of Systematic Reviews with Generative AI Support: An Experience Report from a Graduate Software Engineering Course#1061962
- Ceci N'est Pas un Drone: Investigating the Impact of Design Representation on Design Decision Making When Using GenAI#1129134
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1036459
- How Researchers Use and Verify AI Coding Assistants: Tasks and Validation Practices in Scientific Programming#1006921
- Judgement in the Age of Jev: From Evaluation Scarcity to Evaluation Abundance#1156503
Record · ID 1343561
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive