arXiv (All)
open access
Risk Measures for the Climate Transition Age: Why Symmetric Risk Budgets are unlikely to mitigate two-dimensionally asymmetric Climate Change risks
The most widely used investment risk measures - variance, standard deviation, and tracking error - treat upside deviations as equally undesirable as downside losses. In stable markets with assumed symmetric return distributions, this simplification is potentially harmless. In the climate transition
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Decision-making under model misspecification: an application to climate policy#1158238
- Climate change events and stock market returns#8865
- Climate finance as a catalyst for energy security transitions: The conditional role of natural-resource dependence in developing economies#634599
- Unilateral climate policy, asymmetric backstop adoption, and carbon leakage in a two-region hotelling model#641930
- Unilateral climate policy, asymmetric backstop adoption, and carbon leakage in a two-region hotelling model#16807
Record · ID 1343898
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive