arXiv (All)
open access
PRISM: Calibrating Black-Box Judges with Counterfactual Probes
Large language models are increasingly used as judges to reduce reliance on costly human evaluation, yet their scores can systematically disagree with human judgments. We ask whether responses to an explicitly imposed evaluative bias can help correct a judge's implicit scoring biases. We introduce P
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A CaLLM Judge is a Better Judge: Mitigating Bias in LLM-as-a-judge#1343299
- SkillApt: Learning When to Activate Agent Skills from Counterfactual Evidence#1063074
- Pluralism for Relativists: a new framework for context-dependence#742001
- A Probe Shift Is Not a Fairness Fix: The Limits of Representation Steering in Speech Models#1012713
- Context-indexed counterfactuals and non-vacuous counterpossibles#761316
Record · ID 1343900
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive