arXiv (All)
open access
How Well Do LLMs Perform in Peer Review? Evidence from Finance and Accounting
Referees increasingly use large language models (LLMs), while finance and accounting journals disagree about whether to allow it. We ask which part of a referee's job the models can do. GPT-4o, whose training data end before the 2024 conference season, referees the papers presented at the 2024 AFA a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LLM Persuasion Is in the Eye of the Evaluation#1234599
- LLM Persuasion Is in the Eye of the Evaluation#1227391
- Using LLMs in Software Design: An Empirical Study of GitHub and A Practitioner Survey#1036689
- Choosing LLMs for Strategic Agent Interactions#1343866
- Guiding LLM Peer Reviewers: The Impact of Score Anchors on Review Evidence and Accuracy#822324
Record · ID 1343944
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive