arXiv (All)
open access
When do lazy and invertible cellular automata generate all cellular automata?
Let $G$ be a group and let $A$ be a set with at least two elements. A lazy cellular automaton over $A^G$ acts as the identity except at the cells where a fixed pattern occurs, where it replaces the central symbol by a fixed different symbol. Let $M(G;A)$ be the submonoid of $\mathrm{CA}(G;A)$ genera
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Genome-Scale Analysis of Programmed DNA Elimination Sites in Tetrahymena thermophila#1311550
- The Nexus Framework and the Total Inversion: A Recursive Harmonic Projection of Cellular Civilization#171713
- CodePivot: Bootstrapping Multilingual Transpilation in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning without Parallel Corpora#120581
- Adaptive coupling of chromosomal inversions with multilocus ecological, mating-bias, and hybrid-incompatibility genotypes facilitates sympatric speciation#221572
- Structure and Decomposition of Deltoids in Abelian Groups#1298038
Record · ID 1343985
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive