arXiv (All)
open access
Auditing Future-Memory Use in Point-in-Time Language Agents
Point-in-time (PIT) agents can recall post-cutoff facts even when their external evidence respects a historical cutoff. We examine whether this access predicts evidence gathering in 48 historical company-comparison tasks. Independent closed-book revenue probes identify the better-remembered company
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Scaling Point-in-Time Language Models: Enabling Economic Evaluation of Embeddings#1341472
- Memory as mental time travel#760064
- A Training-Free, Alignment-Free Approach to Corporate Intelligence: Application to SEC Filings#1083236
- Memory and Truth#700807
- VERA-8B: Evidence-Grounded Audit Risk Reasoning from SEC Filings#792410
Record · ID 1344102
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive