arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback
Test-time scaling for large language models (LLMs) can involve generating multiple candidate solutions for selection or revising an earlier attempt. To guide selection and revision, we need a verifier that can estimate candidate correctness and provide evidence of failure. In competitive programming
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond the Verdict: Agentic Code Judging with Verifiable Feedback#1319062
- CodePori: Large-Scale System for Autonomous Software Development Using Multi-Agent Technology#1199619
- Agent Skill Framework: Perspectives on the Potential of Small to Medium Language Models in Industrial Environments#1357110
- The Double Measurement Confound in Agent Benchmarks: De-Scaffolding, Ground-Truth Scoring, and Reliability Beyond the Mean#986988
- Learning to Steer LLM Agents and Multi-Agent Systems#1357971
Record · ID 1344257
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive