arXiv (All)
open access
ResearchFlow-Eval: Tracing the Execution Gap in End-to-End Multi-Claim Autoresearch
Autoresearch systems increasingly undertake entire research projects. In practice, scientific research requires systems to pursue multiple interdependent claims through a continuous, multi-stage workflow and revise experiments as evidence accumulates. Existing evaluations of autoresearch systems, ho
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PaperDoctor: Evidence-Grounded and Actionable Feedback for Scientific Papers in Progress#1123402
- OpenDiscoveryTrace: Process Traces for Evaluating AI Scientist Workflows#986976
- DeepRewind: Predicting and Repairing Premature Commitments in Deep Research Agents#1131186
- Agentic Economies for Autonomous Scientific Discovery#1106261
- ROAR: Unifying Runs across Heterogeneous AI-Driven Research Systems#1199240
Record · ID 1344709
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive