arXiv (All)
open access
Smart Alone, Blind Together: Why Accuracy Fails to CertifyTheory of Mind in Multi-Agent Teams
Coordinators that act on what they infer about teammates are usually certified by the accuracy of those inferences. We argue that accuracy is the wrong certificate, for two reasons. First, the accuracy needed to act depends on what a wrong action costs, so the bar belongs to the deployment, not the
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI in Project Teams: How Trust Calibration Reconfigures Team’s Collaboration and Performance#196265
- Egocentric Bias and Doubt in Cognitive Agents#769807
- The Delegation Blind Spot: Auditing Product Decisions from Agent Choices#1062529
- The Delegation Blind Spot: Auditing Product Decisions from Agent Choices#1043089
- Don't Let One Lie Survive A Hundred Truths: A Selective Bayesian Trust Estimator for Collaborative Perception#1217610
Record · ID 1344874
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive