arXiv (All)
open access
One-Step Prediction Fidelity Is a Poor Proxy for Planning Performance in JEPA World Models
Latent world models are routinely selected, checkpointed and ablated on one-step prediction loss, on the assumption that a model which predicts the next latent better is a better model. In model-based RL this assumption is known to be unreliable; we ask whether it also fails for latent world models,
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- JEPA-Anything: Learning Predictive Models across Different Worlds#1221432
- JEPA-Anything: Learning Predictive Models across Different Worlds#1034592
- ATM: Why Latent World Models Can Fail to Plan#1143799
- When Should a World Model Move? Loss-Conditioned State Execution#1109847
- Anticipating the risks and benefits of counterfactual world simulation models#617142
Record · ID 1345198
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive