arXiv (All)
open access
How Do LLMs Understand Legal Philosophy? Diagnosing Legal-Philosophical Reasoning in LLMs
Legal reasoning is a fundamental capability for large language models (LLMs) to complete legal AI tasks such as legal judgment prediction. In legal practice, this reasoning is shaped by legal philosophy: a judge's view of the nature and sources of law guides how legal materials are interpreted and a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Can LLMs Reason in a Legally Meaningful Manner? A Small-scale Study on European Court of Human Rights Cases#1048777
- AIL: Integrating LLM Capacity Awareness, Legal Intuition, and Lexis Understanding into Legal Information Extraction#1178447
- Exploring the psychology of LLMs’ moral and legal reasoning#1135299
- Knowledge-Infused Legal Wisdom: Navigating LLM Consultation through the Lens of Diagnostics and Positive-Unlabeled Reinforcement Learning#285508
- Leveraging LLM agents and knowledge models for automated legal reasoning#1178520
Record · ID 1345250
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive