arXiv (All)
open access
Noisy-Label Calibration with Multiple Unreliable Labels
In medical annotation and crowdsourcing, multiple annotators assign labels to each example, but these labels may be incorrect. Treating such noisy labels as ground truth can bias calibration evaluation. To address this problem, we propose methods for evaluating and recalibrating a fixed binary predi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Federated Medical Image Segmentation under Real-World Label Noise: A Benchmark Suite for Noisy Label Learning Method Selection#280158
- An Assessment of Human vs. Model Uncertainty in Soft-Label Learning and Calibration#1215406
- Evaluating automatic label noise detection in 3D segmentation with realistic label noise#1194247
- When Noise Meets Long-Tail: Feature-Threshold Dual Calibration for Robust Pseudo-Labeling#1118741
- KneePreM: Towards 3D Knee MRI Foundation Models via Large-Scale Unlabeled Pretraining and Label-Efficient Fine-Tuning#1106160
Record · ID 1345366
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive