Comments on RFC 123
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
Network Working Group J. Postel Request for Comments # 127 20 April 71 NIC #5843 UCLA [Category D.1 Computer Science Updates 123]
Comments on RFC 123
The following is my interpretation of the exchange between NCP's which would be necessary to carry out the Initial Connection Protocol of RFC 123.
Server NCP User NCP ---------- --------
Listen for Connection on L RTS, U, L, l STR, L, U, 32 A
Send 32 bits of data in 1 message on link l A (value is S) Receive 32 bits of data from link l (value is S) A
CLS, L, U CLS, U, L
STR, S+1, U, B STR, U+1, S, B s u
RTS, S, U+1, l RTS, U, S+1, l B c
wait for connection wait for connection
ALL, l , m , b ALL, l , m , b B B B c c c
data sent on link l data sent on link l c B
data received on link l data received on link l B c
l , l , and l are links, m and m are message allocations, b A B c B c B and b are bit allocations, and all other symbols are as defined in c RFC 123.
[ This RFC was put into machine readable form for entry ] [ into the online RFC archives by Gert Doering 4/97 ]
Related documents
- Request for Comments Summary: RFC Numbers 1000-1099#131682
- Guidelines for Writing RFC Text on Security Considerations#193175
- IANA Allocation Guidelines For Values In the Internet Protocol and Related Headers#139462
- IANA Allocation Guidelines for the Protocol Field#420395
- TLS Fallback Signaling Cipher Suite Value (SCSV) for Preventing Protocol Downgrade Attacks#501945
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive