CanLII
metadata only
R v Reed
Decided: 2026-10-09. Docket: CA50442. Citation: 2026 BCCA 400 (CanLII). Criminal and statutory offences — Appeal — First degree murder — Planning and deliberation — Whether purported admissions, if admitted, could undermine planned and deliberate finding — “Two-step” process proposed for revisiting excluded evidence in judge-alone trial — Argument described as novel and controversial — Court declined to address in this case — Appeal dismissed | Procedure — Trial management — Reconsideration of evidentiary rulings — Whether judge must reconsider exclusion on own motion during deliberations — Reconsideration not requested by defence — Jurisdiction exists but exercised with restraint, material change required (R v Adams) — No exceptional circumstances found — Appeal dismissed | Evidence — Adm
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Aarons#1166780
- R v Haddad#1146889
- Maina v Maina#1360013
- Marlin c. R.#824293
- FH v MH (PD12J: Parallel Criminal Proceedings) [2026] EWFC 195 (B) (13 July 2026)#377052
Record · ID 1347109
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive