Zenodo (CERN)
open access
Rethinking Constitutional Borrowing and Transplants: Receptive Soil, Judicial Posture, and the Regime-Contingent Reception of Article 102 in Bangladesh
This article develops a recipient-centred account of constitutional borrowing through the Bangladeshi reception of judicial review under Article 102 of the Constitution. It argues that borrowed constitutional doctrines do not become meaningful simply because they originate in prestigious jurisdic
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Judicial Federalism in the Trenches: The Rooker-Feldman Doctrine in Action#1019390
- Is This the Beginning of a New Bangladesh?#689918
- Jurisprudence theory and context#335382
- AUGMENTING JUDICIAL FEDERALISM: ANALYZING THE PROPOSITION OF REGIONAL BRANCHES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA#266360
- Jurisprudence: Readings and Cases#1177980
Record · ID 1348409
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive