arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
[DeepGOF] Where Does a Logistic Risk Model Fail? An Audited Neural Goodness-of-Fit Test for Model Development and External Validation
Goodness-of-fit tests for logistic regression are routine in clinical risk modelling, yet the classical tests say whether a model misfits, not where. A pretrained network is not a test until its level, power and blind spots are established. We audit DeepGOF-1, which renders the residuals of a fitted
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- One Goodness-of-Fit Test Is Not Enough: Error-Controlled Localization of Misfit in Logistic Risk Models#1326899
- How Models Fail#117365
- Tree Induction vs. Logistic Regression: A Learning-Curve Analysis#933260
- Is TabPFN the Silver Bullet for Insurance Pricing?#1297143
- Counterfactual Fragility Certificates: Exposing High-Confidence Brittleness under Structured Evidence Failure#819818
Record · ID 1348952
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive