ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Pilot Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Complications for Mandibular Implant Overdentures Retained by Different Splinted Attachment Systems
This exploratory pilot randomized clinical study enrolled ten completely edentulous participants who experienced retention and stability problems with conventional mandibular complete dentures. Participants were randomly allocated to receive mandibular implant-supported overdentures retained by either a bar-locator attachment system (n = 5) or a bar-ball attachment system (n = 5). Denture satisfaction was assessed using the McGill Denture Satisfaction Questionnaire
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PEEK Retentive Elements Versus Conventional#1350538
- Patient Satisfaction in Single Implant Mandibular Complete Overdentures Retained by CM LOC Versus Ball Attachment#861489
- Influence of Implants and Locators for Improved Retention#861400
- Comparative Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency of Implant Supported Overdenture#842044
- Evaluation of Masticatory Performance and Patient Satisfaction for Conventional and 3D Printed Implant Overdentures#1173042
Record · ID 1349250
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive