ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
SAS-J Compared to OAGB and LSG as a Treatment for Morbid Obesity
150 morbidly obese patients divided into to equal groups, group A underwent single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass and group B underwent mini gastric bypass, group C underwent sleeve gastrectomy. All patients were followed for at least one year. all cases were evaluated as regard BMI, complications, nutritional status and obesity-related comorbidities.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Sarcopenic Obesity on Weight Loss Outcomes and Quality of Life After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy#834031
- Randomized Comparison of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass for Morbid Obesity#876281
- Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Management of Morbid Obese Patients: A Comparative Study#1073879
- Sleeve Gastrectomy With Jejuno-ileal Bypass Versus Single Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass#1352944
- Efficacy and Mechanism Study of Bariatric Surgery to Treat Moderate to Severe Obesity in Han Chinese Population#849021
Record · ID 1349554
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive