ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
LVSP Based CRT vs. RVAP Based CRT
To find out whether left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP)-based cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is superior to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP)-based CRT in patients with failed left bundle branch pacing at the beginning of chronic heart failure.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: CONSYST-CRT.#1307879
- Multipoint pacing is associated with reduction of heart failure hospitalizations or death in patients who do not respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of the MORE-CRT MPP randomized trial#361976
- Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy and AV Nodal Ablation Trial in Atrial Fibrillation Patients (CAAN-AF)#876092
- Resynchronization/Defibrillation for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial#1182861
- Safety and Effectiveness of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Defibrillation#900092
Record · ID 1350673
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive