ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Impact of Multi-component Interventions on Populations With Mental Health Symptoms and High-risk COPD
Study Participants: High-risk COPD population with mental health symptoms, defined as individuals whose score of COPD-SQ ≥ 16, whose age is 35 and above, and whose Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale \<45 . Intervention: We have constructed a pay-for-population mechanism for medical practitioners within the intervention townships to encourage them caring for population health. For study participants in the intervention arm, we will ask them to finish an online COPD-SQ questionnaire with notification of his or her COPD high risk status. For those with high-risk COPD population, we will provide face-to-face survey, simple physical examination, pulmonary function tests, and provide a multi-component intervention at baseline. For high-risk COPD population with mental health issues in the intervention arm, we provide community-based spirometry pulmonary function test (PFT) and education; If individuals whose post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC\<0.7, they will be spirometry-defined COPD patients and will be encouraged to seek treatment and medication to the superior hospitals. A CBT-based digital health intervention program, EmoEase, will be provided to our study participants with an intelligent mobile phone. Also health education in terms of mental health issues will be given. Additionally, we provide (1) a digital health intervention programs to smokers; (2) CBT-based health education for study participants with abnormal BMI; (3) active recruitment into National Essential Public Health Program in China for those with abnormal blood pressure and blood glucose. Intensive follow-ups will be conducted at month 3 (telephone interview), month 6 (face-to-face with full steps of physical examination), and month 12. Comparison: Those who are assigned in the control arm, we will ask them to finish the same COPD-SQ online questionnaire with notification of his or her COPD high risk status and a face-to-face survey. No physical examinations, community-based pulmonary function test
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Impact of Multi-Component Interventions on High Risk COPD Population#1293796
- Prevalence Study and Regular Practice Among General Practitioners in Populations at Risk of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Latin America#901026
- Community Based Self Management of COPD Facilitated by a Palliative Care Team:Impact on Health Care Utilization and QOL#869390
- Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Functional Outcomes and Its Relationship With Morbidity and Mortality in Patients With COPD#1127308
- A clinical psychology competency framework and measure: the development and initial validation of the Clinical Subscale for the Competencies of Professional Psychology Rating (COPPR) Scales, the COPPR-Clinical.#457300
Record · ID 1352236
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive