ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Determination of Best PEEP (Positive End-expiratory Pressure) in Anesthetized Infants in Terms of Prevention of Atelectasis
Purpose of research; to determine the appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure to minimize atelectasis during general anesthesia in infants. Study design : Application of one pressure of PEEP among 3, 6, or 9 cmH2O during mechanical positive ventilation for general anesthesia to randomly assigned infants over 6 months to 13 months of age . Immediately after the start of anesthesia (PEEP=0) and before the end of anesthesia, the score of atelectasis is measured by lung ultrasonography with the standardized method. The scores at PEEP3, PEEP6, and PEEP9 will be compared to identify the appropriate PEEP at which atelectasis is the least likely to occur during anesthesia. Medical Equipment : Ultrasonography with 6 - 13 MHz linear probe, Cardio-Q esophageal Doppler The number of target subjects: According to the results of previous studies, the lung ultrasound score by ultrasonography at the end of anesthesia was 28.5 (IQR 21.8-37) without any recruitment (PEEP 0 cmH2O) (IQR 6-21.3). When PEEP of 5 cmH2O was maintained, the lung ultrasound score is 12.5 (IQR 6-21.3), which is lower than PEEP 0. It is assumed that the score at PEEP3 is 20, the score at optimal PEEP is 10, and the standard deviation is 11. Bonferroni correction is required for statistical analysis. In comparison between the two groups, alpha is used as the Bonferroni corrected alpha level of 0.05 / 3 = 0.017. The significance level alpha is fixed at 0.017 and the number of samples considering the 10% dropout rate when the power (1-β) is 80% is required to be 30 for each group. Data analysis and statistical methods: Atelectasis score, cardiac index, peak inspiratory pressure, and dynamic compliance will be compared by t-test between groups(PEEP3 vs PEEP 6, PEEP 3 vs PEEP 9, PEEP 6 vs PEEP 9). P \< 0.017 is going to be considered statistically significant.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Re-Evaluation of the Effects of High PEEP During General Anesthesia For Surgery (REPEAT)#891546
- Ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) Ratio and Alveolar Surface Area in Preterm Infants#882389
- The Effect of High-flow Nasal Oxygen Flow Rate on Gas Exchange During Apnoea#1170757
- Driving Pressure During General Anesthesia for Open Abdominal Surgery#1350628
- NHFOV vs NIPPV vs nCPAP in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome#1057321
Record · ID 1352567
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive