ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Suspended Personal Protection System Versus Conventional Protection (Aka Zero-Gravity vs Shield and Apron)
This trial investigates operator radiation doses when performing standardized procedures using two different means of radiation protection, namely conventional lead shield and apron versus suspended protection system (Zero-Gravity, ZG). The performed procedure is standard endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The hypothesis is that ZG offers superior protection for the operator.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Randomized Comparison of Radiation Exposure to Operators in Coronary Intervention Between Right Radial and Left DRA#881548
- Reduce Radiation Exposure in Fluoroscopic Interventions Evaluation#1088044
- Operational radiation protection for astronauts and cosmonauts and correlated activities of ESA Medical Operations#367090
- A Lead Rectangle to Lower the Operator's Radiation Exposure#884589
- Comparison of Operator Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Between Left Distal and Right Conventional Radial Access#966749
Record · ID 1353030
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive