arXiv (All)
open access
ReFormBench: Benchmarking the Stability of Response-Conditioned Format Correction in Large Language Models
Reliable use of large language models requires responses to satisfy formatting requirements across changing instructions. Standard compliance scores do not distinguish preserving a model's observed format from correcting it, or reveal whether that correction holds across variants. We introduce ReFor
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Large Language Model Turnover Undermines Screening for Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Scientific Writing#1248879
- LLMs Silently Correct African American English: Auditing and Mitigating Dialect Bias via Activation Steering#1327450
- What It Costs to Compose, Rebuild, and Correct Precomputed Memory#818703
- What It Costs to Compose, Rebuild, and Correct Precomputed Memory#808711
- Chronicle: Cut-Point Replay for Regression Testing of LLM Agents#1034432
Record · ID 1354382
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive