arXiv (All)
open access
Quantifying Annotation Agreement in Object Detection with Optimal Transport
Reliable validation of machine learning models is a crucial step in designing robust and trustworthy systems. Yet validation relies on annotated test sets treated as ground truth, even though annotations can be noisy or ambiguous. In object detection, sources may disagree on object presence, box loc
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Does Model Uncertainty Track Human Ambiguity? Evidence from Multi-Annotator Vision Benchmarks#1128774
- SAFe: Segment-guided Aggregation of Feature Densities for Anomaly-aware Segmentation#1050387
- Rethinking Post-Hoc Calibration in Semantic Segmentation#1052223
- Task-Sensitive Geometry of Representation Transfer for Object Detection under Image Degradation#1200278
- Detect Anything in Graphic Design: Element-Level Rewards for Autoregressive Detection#975136
Record · ID 1354594
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive