arXiv (All)
open access
Calibration-Preserving Pruning: Compression as a Reliability Contract
Split conformal prediction, not the pruning rule, supplies finite-sample marginal coverage once a pruned model is fixed independently of the conformal calibration split. We study the separate efficiency problem: can pruning preserve score geometry well enough to obtain smaller valid prediction sets?
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Conformal Prediction under Partial Verification#1247756
- RObust Header Compression (ROHC): Context Replication for ROHC Profiles#500551
- FSZ: Breaking the Prediction-Throughput Trade-off in GPU Lossy Compression#381719
- VIREL: Verified Integer-Residual Encoding on Lattices for Exact and Error-Bounded Floating-Point Time-Series Compression#411168
- CPR-IE:A Compression-Prediction-Resource Intelligence Efficiency Metric#971475
Record · ID 1355599
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive