arXiv (All)
open access
When Correctness Feedback Erases Evidence: Phase-Separated Completeness Auditing in Verus
Correctness feedback suppresses the very evidence that specification-completeness auditing is designed to uncover: programs that satisfy a written contract but violate intended behavior. We demonstrate this objective reversal on 12 Verus/Rust tasks across four model families under matched call budge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- High-Level Explanation and the Interventionist’s ‘Variables Problem’#734716
- Epistemic Infrastructure: Maintained Orders of Actionable Disclosure Under Constraint#95203
- Experimental Design: Ethics, Integrity and the Scientific Method#102053
- When Does Trimming Help Conformal Prediction? A Retained-Law Diagnostic under Calibration Contamination#1342473
- Why formal objections to the error theory fail#696945
Record · ID 1355665
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive