arXiv (All)
open access
When Reasoning Traces Conflict with Evidence: How Answer Configuration Shapes Evidence Following
A reasoning trace retained at answer time plays two roles: it can raise accuracy, and it can compete with the current evidence when the two disagree. We disentangle these roles by crossing verified evidence versions with the traces generated from each and answering from the same traces and evidence
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond One-Shot Expansion: Contrastive Evidence Exploration for Multi-Hop Retrieval#975116
- GeopoliticalQA: Benchmarking Retrieval and Generation over Intelligence Reports#1296624
- Inferential Stability as an Epistemic Criterion: A Structural Inquiry into Doxastic Robustness#708608
- HEAL: Hindsight Entropy-Assisted Learning for Reasoning Distillation#819312
- HEAL: Hindsight Entropy-Assisted Learning for Reasoning Distillation#809319
Record · ID 1355794
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive