arXiv (All)
open access
Language models recognize dropout and Gaussian noise applied to their activations
We provide evidence that language models can detect, localize and, to a degree, verbalize the difference between a-semantic perturbations applied to their activations. More precisely, we either (a) apply dropout or (b) add Gaussian noise to them, at a target sentence. We then ask a multiple-choice q
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Detectable Only Where It Is Confounded: What Verified Duplication Counts Say About Membership Evidence in Language Models#673430
- Language models suffer from a curse of ambiguity#616614
- Language models suffer from a curse of ambiguity#616114
- Quantifying and Improving the Robustness of Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Against Spurious Features in Grounding Data#173258
- JustMem: Just-Enough Memory Access for Long-Term Conversations#1014924
Record · ID 1356022
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive