arXiv (All)
open access
Can Crowdsourcing Survive the LLM Era? A Community Survey on Human Data Collection
The widespread use of Large Language Models (LLMs) as writing tools challenges the validity of crowdsourced data, as crowdworkers may outsource tasks to models. To better understand how this is addressed, we surveyed 155 researchers in NLP and related disciplines about their experiences and opinions
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Toward Reproducible Research with LLMs: Guidance for Documentation, Reporting, and Transparency#1040277
- Self-prompting and cross-model consensus enable reproducible data extraction from scientific literature with large language models#467167
- CrowdMath: A Dataset of Crowdsourced Mathematical Research Discussions#792761
- CrowdMath: A Dataset of Crowdsourced Mathematical Research Discussions#788761
- SciLitBench: Benchmark and Design Principles for LLM-Powered Systematic Literature Reviews#972566
Record · ID 1356072
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive