arXiv (All)
open access
Thinking in Graphs: Neo4j-Backed Exploit-Chain Reasoning for LLM Penetration-Testing Agents
LLM coding agents such as Claude Code and OpenAI Codex can drive penetration-testing tools, but they reason about an engagement as a flat list of findings in a context window. Attackers think in graphs: isolated low-severity exposures turn catastrophic once chained through credential capture, privil
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Thinking in Graphs: Neo4j-Backed Exploit-Chain Reasoning for LLM Penetration-Testing Agents#1348804
- Correct Verdicts, Flawed Reasoning: Structured Auditing of LLM-based Vulnerability Reasoning#1215469
- Correct Verdicts, Flawed Reasoning: Structured Auditing of LLM-based Vulnerability Reasoning#1194317
- Capturing the Hostile Attribution Bias through Conditional Reasoning Tasks: The Hostile Reasoning Test as an Indirect Measure of Aggressiveness#1108212
- Capturing the Hostile Attribution Bias through Conditional Reasoning Tasks: The Hostile Reasoning Test as an Indirect Measure of Aggressiveness#1108111
Record · ID 1356238
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive