arXiv (All)
open access
How large an effect would we have seen? Positive controls, detection floors and dataset pitfalls in scalp-EEG speech decoding
Objective. Studies that decode imagined speech from scalp electroencephalography (EEG) commonly validate their pipelines with a positive control, usually overt speech, and report null results without stating what effect size the pipeline could have detected. Approach. Using ds003626 ("Thinking out l
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Overlap Area as a Novel Measure of Effect Size in Neuroscience Research#370420
- Many Pipelines, One Dataset: Analytic Flexibility and Its Impact in EEG Research#158334
- Efficient Concertormer for Image Deblurring and Beyond#1037668
- The Beneficial Effects of Pomegranate on Hearing of Patients Without Hemodialysis#970056
- Low Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging Assessment With Outpatients#833685
Record · ID 1356278
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive