arXiv (All)
open access
What Should We Remove? Evaluating the Reliability and Costs of RLVR Data Decontamination
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) math corpora are routinely screened for benchmark overlap, but the reliability and data-loss costs of cleaning policies remain underexamined. We audit sixteen open RLVR math corpora comprising 1,673,514 corpus-specific training items against six
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When and Where to Trust the Teacher: Unifying On-Policy Distillation and GRPO through Entropy-Calibrated Credit Assignment#1064988
- Post-Training at the Edge of Detectability: A Game-Theoretic Approach to Fine-Tuning#1118668
- Train Short, Act Long: Multistability and the Horizon Independence of Recurrent Policies#1327386
- Decoupling Exploration from Optimization in RLVR#1234961
- Decoupling Exploration from Optimization in RLVR#1227311
Record · ID 1356565
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive