arXiv (All)
open access
Combining LLM and Dynamic Analysis for Universal Testing of Static Application Security Testing Tools
Static application security testing (SAST) tools help detect potential software vulnerabilities, but they themselves contain faults undermining reliability and usability. Automated testing can address these issues, yet current techniques suffer from limited program transformation diversity and lack
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Barriers to Using Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools: A Literature Review#822106
- Combining LLM and Dynamic Analysis for Universal Testing of Static Application Security Testing Tools#1348779
- Barriers to Using Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools: A Literature Review#632908
- Beyond Static Guarantees: Measuring the Static-Pass Dynamic-Fail Gap in Security-Sensitive and LLM-Generated Python Code#997752
- One Pipeline Does Not Fit All: TAILOR, a Type- and State-Aware Framework for CVE Reproduction#1132207
Record · ID 1356645
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive