arXiv (All)
open access
Evaluating Inquiry Learning in LLM-Based Agents: Hypothesizing, Reasoning, and Exploration
Scientific inquiry involves iterative cycles of exploration, hypothesis generation, and reasoning over observations to uncover relationships in complex systems. Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in several components of this process, including inductive reasoning, hy
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Why Do LLM Agents Fail in Exploring New Environments? A World-Modeling Perspective#987487
- What is the Role of Small Models in the LLM Era: A Survey#1049587
- Collaborative Learning and Reasoning over Model Slices#1297279
- LLM-as-an-Investigator: Evidence-First Agentic Reasoning for Robust Interactive Problem Diagnosis#1355587
- Tasks over Application Manuals: Revealing Gaps in Long-Horizon Procedural Reasoning for Language Models#1070513
Record · ID 1356940
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive