arXiv (All)
open access
Explanation Generation for Contradiction Reconciliation with LLMs
Existing NLP work commonly treats contradictions as errors to be resolved by choosing which statements to accept or discard. Yet a key aspect of human reasoning in social and professional settings is the ability to hypothesize explanations that reconcile contradictions. For example, "Cassie hates co
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Deeper Look at Depth: Stable Generation Accounting for Quantifier Reasoning#1062242
- Explorable Proofs: Making Written Proofs Explorable by Grounding Them in Formal Representations#1354872
- Absolute Contradiction, Dialetheism, and Revenge#700650
- LMT Consistency Framework: Early Contradiction Detection and Mode-Switching in LLM Responses – An Empirical Comparison of Standard vs. Consistency-Enforced Behaviors#722848
- Quotation Marks and Kinds of Meaning. Arguments in Favor of a Pragmatic Account#770873
Record · ID 1357132
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive