arXiv (All)
open access
Abstracts or full text? Evaluating input scope and computational efficiency in biomedical lay summarization
Biomedical research articles are mainly written for experts and often contain terms that are difficult for the general public to understand. Automated lay summarization has become a solution to make biomedical knowledge easier for patients and the public to understand. However, generating lay summar
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Patient-Centered Summarization Framework for AI Clinical Summarization: Mixed Methods Study.#653560
- BioMedGraphica: an all-in-one platform for joint textual biomedical prior knowledge and numeric graph generation.#297237
- Clarity Without Credibility? Human Versus AI Abstracts in Otolaryngology.#402633
- Enhancing Clinical Decision Support Systems with Big Data and AI in Medical Informatics#1178416
- Biomedical text normalization through generative modeling.#327021
Record · ID 1357345
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive