arXiv (All)
open access
From Research Goals to Scientific Closure: Evaluating Agents Through Evidence-Supported Physics Research
Can AI agents organize scientific investigations that lead to well-supported conclusions? To evaluate this capability, we introduce PhysClosureBench, a benchmark of 50 expert-verified, goal-specified research tasks spanning strong-field, attosecond, and neighboring physics areas. Each task specifies
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Agentic Hybrid RAG for Evidence-Grounded Muon Collider Analysis#1129292
- TruthInsightBench: An Evidence-Grounded Benchmark for Automated Evaluation of Open-Ended Scientific Discovery Agents#985283
- TheoPhysEval: Assessing AI agents at autonomous theoretical physics problem solving#1344692
- Principles and Techniques for Agentic Research in Experimental Physics#1342070
- Closing the Empirical Loop: Autonomous AI Agents Conduct End-to-end Research With Human Participants#922268
Record · ID 1357422
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive