OSF
open access
Beyond validity: Empirical investigations of the statistical power of da in Recognition Memory
cognitive-psychologymathematical-psychologymemorypsychometricsquantitative-methodssocial-and-behavioral-sciences
Recognition memory relies on sensitivity measures to identify memory effects (i.e., differences in sensitivity). Alas, all commonly used sensitivity measures (d′, A′, Percent correct, and Pr) have been shown to be confounded with response bias, raising serious validity concerns for the literature. d
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond validity: Empirical investigations of the statistical power of da in Recognition Memory#1360210
- List-length and list-strength effects in recognition memory#1263857
- Pilot Study of the Feasibility and Efficacy of Working Memory Training in Children With Cochlear Implants#1197894
- RLHF as Conditioning: Doctrinal Templates, Narrative Selfhood Engineering, and the Subject Position in Safety-Trained Language Models#689540
- Description and Evaluation of a Visual Acuity Assessment Paradigm Based on Spatial Frequency-Modulated Form Discrimination.#1107401
Record · ID 1360332
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive