OSF
open access
Comparative Optimism for Getting Infected With COVID-19: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis and Critical Reflection on Research Practices
Comparative optimism (believing one’s own risk is lower than others’) has been widely studied. Nonetheless, important methodological features have largely remained unrecognized. Focusing on a single event (contracting COVID-19), we estimated the average effect, tested moderators with attention to me
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparative Optimism for Getting Infected With COVID-19: An Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis and Critical Reflection on Research Practices#1360246
- How COVID-19 affected academic publishing: a 3-year study of 17 million research papers#233609
- Identification of the causal odds ratio in test-negative-design studies of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness#15487
- Anatomy of a Conspiracy Theory: Law, Politics, and Science Denialism in the Era of COVID-19#1021957
- COVID-19 and Science Communication: The Recording and Reporting of Disease Mortality#102913
Record · ID 1360393
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive