OSF
open access
The Real Wrongs of ICWA
Haaland v. Brackeen rejected federalism-based challenges to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) but signaled receptivity to future challenges based on individual rights. The adult-focused rights claims presented in Haaland, however, miss the mark of what is truly problematic about ICWA. This Article
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human Rights Abrogation Through Resource Extraction in Kenya: A Policy Analysis#174310
- 25 U.S.C. § 5342 — Contracts for education, medical attention, relief and social welfare of Indians#581313
- For Whom Are Child Protection Provisions Intended? An Argument about the Taiwan Railways Public Sex Event#251398
- Dr. B.R. Ambedkar as a Contemporary Indian Thinker#111634
- The Child and the State: A Noramtive Theory of Juvenile Rights#722261
Record · ID 1360434
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive