OSF
open access
When Engagement Is Not Enough: What Should AI Optimize in Gamified Education?
Neither study used AI as an educational intervention. Two non-AI studies inform outcome selection for future educational AI. In crossover STEAM education (n = 49), interest favored gamified instruction (d_z = 0.64), whereas perceived expression acquisition favored conventional instruction (d_z = -0.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Perceived Effects of Artificial Intelligence on Students' Learning Efficiency in Social Studies 10#1038865
- INVESTIGATING THE EFFECTIVE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ELT TEACHER EDUCATION: TOWARDS DEVELOPING A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK#301755
- AI avatars in education: effects on knowledge acquisition, academic motivation, and cognitive load.#645150
- Exploring the Broad Impact of AI Technologies on Student Engagement and Academic Performance in University Settings in Afghanistan#1017743
- The Uneven Impact of Generative AI on Student Learning: Examining the Roles of Reliance, Evaluation Literacy, and Course Policy in AI-related Courses#1012848
Record · ID 1360443
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive