OSF
open access
No evidence of favorable U.S. case law for authors suing journals over retractions and corrections
Journals and publishers report delaying or refraining from correcting the scientific record because of threats of legal actions from authors. Little is known, however, about the actual litigation risks they face in this context. To address this gap, we systematically searched for legal decisions in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effects of Copyrights on Science - Evidence from the US Book Republication Program#21475
- Stop paying predatory publishers of academic journals—A policy proposal to restore scientific integrity and transparency#983863
- To Hedge or Not to Hedge: Scientific Claims and Public Justification#705399
- Copyright in scientific publishing. Useful information and insights#390569
- A Comparative Discussion of Who Pays for Document Discovery in Australia, Canada, Guernsey (Channel Islands), and Singapore and its Effect on Access to Justice#1019644
Record · ID 1360444
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive