arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Learning to Interpret Forecasts: Evidence Quality and Source Familiarity
We study how learning about a forecasting method affects a seller's choice of evidence. More evidence improves the current forecast but makes the method's persistent component harder to identify. A monopolist may therefore collect less evidence initially to help customers interpret later forecasts.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- What Goes Up Must Come Down? Experimental Evidence on Intuitive Forecasting#221620
- Accuracy Is Not Service: A Decision-Aware Benchmark for Intermittent-Demand Forecasting#1083335
- How Model Choice Obscures Forecast Uncertainty: The Rashomon Effect and the 2026 Senate#390042
- Explaining Time Series Forecasting with Horizon-Resolved Attribution#1070125
- JudgeCast: Time Series Forecasting with Experience-Informed Covariate Judgements#1132167
Record · ID 1361475
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive