ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Partial-thickness/Non-advanced vs. Full-thickness/MCAT Tunnelling for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions
Included patients will be randomly allocated to the test (split-thickness non-advanced tunnel - Zabalegui et al. 1999) or to the control group (full-thickness coronally-advanced tunnel - MCAT - Aroca et al. 2010).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Novel Vertical Y-shaped Tunnel Approach Versus Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel Technique, for The Treatment of Miller Class I Gingival Recession#852937
- Evaluation of the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recession Using Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel With Subepithelial Connective Tissue Graft Depending on the Positioning of the Graft#911798
- Comparing Tunnel Technique and CAF With CTG in Mandibular Gingival Recession Treatment#994032
- Platelet Rich Fibrin vs Sub Epithelial Connective Tissue and Coronally Advanced Flap Alone in Gingival Recession#858421
- Adjunctive Topical Melatonin Gel in Non-Surgical Periodontal Therapy for Periodontitis#1245590
Record · ID 1363122
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive