ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of AMR and ADR Between Endocuff Vision-assisted and Conventional Colonoscopy: a Multicenter Randomized Trial
The aim of this international multicenter study is to compare the adenoma detection rate and adenoma miss rate of conventional and Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Full-spectrum Endoscopy in Colorectal Cancer Screening#827166
- Use of a Distal Colonoscope Attachment to Increase Detection of Sessile Serrated Adenomas#884512
- The Clinical Value of Chromoendoscopy as Surveillance Strategy for Dysplasia Detection in Ulcerative Colitis#824970
- Comparison Between Axial- and Lateral-viewing Capsule Endoscopy in Celiac Disease#1137714
- Assessing Depth of Small Bowel Insertion at Push Enteroscopy by Using Capsule Endoscopy#1163232
Record · ID 1363197
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive