ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Nasotracheal Intubation in Critically Ill.
The aim of this prospective randomized trail is to compare nasotracheal versus orotracheal intubation in critically ill patients. We aim to study: * required sedation depth * rate of spontaneous breathing * extend and possibility of physiotherapy * vasopressor and sedative drug doses Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive either nasotracheal or orotracheal intubation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparison of Rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg and Remifentanil 2 µg/kg in Elderly Patients Over 80 Years#1096022
- Video-stylet for Nasotracheal Intubation in Limited Mouth Opening Patient#897149
- The Ideal Length of the Nasotracheal Tube Considering Nasotracheal Tube Size#840134
- Optimal Sevoflurane Concentration for Intubation in Combination of Clincal Remifentanil Doses#1073387
- Sevoflurane- Safety in Long-term Sedation Procedures#1262150
Record · ID 1363239
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive